I was so pleased with my nonce word, "badministration," for the government perpetrated upon us by the moron majority that I wanted to make sure it didn't elude your scrutiny.
Further, it occurred to me that "B.O." was the designation, according to Monopoly, of a railroad, and isn't that a significant coincidence?
Yves
Monday, June 29, 2009
ME'NAGE A - QUOI?
Busily redefining life, death, and lesser phenomena, B.O.’s badministration has not neglected the family. At least for federal benefits purposes, a pair of same-sex homosexuals is being proposed to count as one. (Not having read the fine print, I don’t know if a pair of different-sex homosexuals’ living together would qualify, but no doubt the likes of Pelosi, Boxer, Rangel, Reid, and Feinstein will tell us.)
What I’m wondering, though, is that if the transmogrification of the concept of “family” is to be made on the dimension of sexual deviation, why not include a man that has intercourse with a ewe or a woman, with a dog? In these cases federal benefits could be extended to cover veterinarian bills for the thereomorphic half of the union. As of this time, maternity benefits would not be reckoned, but with the biological strides this badministration will approve, even that sky may not be the limit.
Sublunary thinkers cannot even contemplate what other innovations B.O. & Co. may introduce; perhaps one federal employee, bunking with 5-6 other homo’s will be a family the taxpayers can subsidize.
Another question is what’s wrong with including a pair of men or a pair of women that do NOT do deviational acts with one another? Is it necessary to be disgusting in order to take? Under this give-everything-to-everybody excuse for a government, why would a normal pair of people be excluded? Wait! I just answered my own question – NORMALITY, OF COURSE, IS THEIR DEFECT!
What I’m wondering, though, is that if the transmogrification of the concept of “family” is to be made on the dimension of sexual deviation, why not include a man that has intercourse with a ewe or a woman, with a dog? In these cases federal benefits could be extended to cover veterinarian bills for the thereomorphic half of the union. As of this time, maternity benefits would not be reckoned, but with the biological strides this badministration will approve, even that sky may not be the limit.
Sublunary thinkers cannot even contemplate what other innovations B.O. & Co. may introduce; perhaps one federal employee, bunking with 5-6 other homo’s will be a family the taxpayers can subsidize.
Another question is what’s wrong with including a pair of men or a pair of women that do NOT do deviational acts with one another? Is it necessary to be disgusting in order to take? Under this give-everything-to-everybody excuse for a government, why would a normal pair of people be excluded? Wait! I just answered my own question – NORMALITY, OF COURSE, IS THEIR DEFECT!
Saturday, June 27, 2009
A VERY SHORT COURSE IN ECONOMIC/ECOLOGICAL REASON
FACTS
1. Many of the highest world-wide average temperatures on record have occurred within the past few years.
2. The most significant greenhouse gas is water vapor. If you want to see this deadly agent, look up - CLOUDS.
3. Scientists - meaning people learned in Science, not pseudo-politicians, as Carl Sagan was and self-interested politicians, as Albert Gore is - cannot as yet measure the significance of even water vapor to global warming.
4. Scientific evidence - meaning collected by scientists (see item 2. above) - proves that there have been such periods of global warming, not to mention ice ages, countless times over millions of years WHEN NO HUMANS EXISTED TO RUIN THE ENVIRONMENT.
CONCLUSION
While it is highly meritorious to conserve fuel and reduce pollution, it is the uninformed policy of idiots to make expenditures we cannot afford and pursue every half-assed, supposedly GREEN notion that surfaces in the mind of one or another half-assed liberal.
People and governments that operate in that fashion are GREEN, to be sure, meaning inexperienced and inept.
Y.C.
1. Many of the highest world-wide average temperatures on record have occurred within the past few years.
2. The most significant greenhouse gas is water vapor. If you want to see this deadly agent, look up - CLOUDS.
3. Scientists - meaning people learned in Science, not pseudo-politicians, as Carl Sagan was and self-interested politicians, as Albert Gore is - cannot as yet measure the significance of even water vapor to global warming.
4. Scientific evidence - meaning collected by scientists (see item 2. above) - proves that there have been such periods of global warming, not to mention ice ages, countless times over millions of years WHEN NO HUMANS EXISTED TO RUIN THE ENVIRONMENT.
CONCLUSION
While it is highly meritorious to conserve fuel and reduce pollution, it is the uninformed policy of idiots to make expenditures we cannot afford and pursue every half-assed, supposedly GREEN notion that surfaces in the mind of one or another half-assed liberal.
People and governments that operate in that fashion are GREEN, to be sure, meaning inexperienced and inept.
Y.C.
NOT A EULOGY
I do not wish ill fate or fortune to anyone and feel about M. Jackson's demise the same regret as strikes me about any other person that has died prematurely.
At the same time I cannot fathom the tides of sorrow and lamentation lavished on what, by all accounts and evidence, was an odious, destructive pedophile.
These demonstrations of grief impress me as just one more symptom of a country that has lost its values and standards, and, lately, a new one seems to pop up most every day.
Accompanying this opinion is a sincere prayer for the repose of his soul.
Y.C.
At the same time I cannot fathom the tides of sorrow and lamentation lavished on what, by all accounts and evidence, was an odious, destructive pedophile.
These demonstrations of grief impress me as just one more symptom of a country that has lost its values and standards, and, lately, a new one seems to pop up most every day.
Accompanying this opinion is a sincere prayer for the repose of his soul.
Y.C.
Monday, June 22, 2009
CONSISTENCY?
In 1988 an inebriate Bruce Kimball, Olympic diver and himself a victim of a drunk driver, ran his car into a crowd of young people, of whom two were killed, five injured. For this crime he was sentenced to 17 years in prison, where he served five and was forbidden ever to drive again.
More recently and also in Florida, an inebriate Donte’ Stallworth, professional football player, ran his car into one person, whom he killed. For this crime he was sentenced to 30 days in jail, 2 years of house arrest, which posits a house sufficiently large not to interfere with playing football, and 8 years of probation.
There seems to be erratic functioning of Justice’s scales, don’t you think, or is the problem with Florida? That, after all, is where Judge George Greer and appeals judges presided over the murder of defenseless Terri Schindler. Anyone that considers death by dehydration and starvation as a “mercy” killing should read the medical consequences of that sentence.
More recently and also in Florida, an inebriate Donte’ Stallworth, professional football player, ran his car into one person, whom he killed. For this crime he was sentenced to 30 days in jail, 2 years of house arrest, which posits a house sufficiently large not to interfere with playing football, and 8 years of probation.
There seems to be erratic functioning of Justice’s scales, don’t you think, or is the problem with Florida? That, after all, is where Judge George Greer and appeals judges presided over the murder of defenseless Terri Schindler. Anyone that considers death by dehydration and starvation as a “mercy” killing should read the medical consequences of that sentence.
Thursday, June 18, 2009
MORE AMERICAN GENEROSITY
Lately I heard an interesting tale I have no reason to doubt, as it was related by the Mr. X mentioned below.
Mr. X, a naturalized citizen from country A, is a successful small businessman with a few enterprises. Mrs. X is a naturalized citizen of country B, where Communism happily collapsed, whereas the corrupt system continues to creak along in country A.
For a number of years, Mrs. X’s elderly mother traveled annually from B to spend several months with the X’s, and during that time Mr. X paid all her medical expenses and drug costs here. One year the U.S. said her visits were too prolonged to be classed as tourism and denied her a visa.
The X’s hired an attorney to investigate and learned that if the mother obtained a green card, she could live here permanently. She did just that, and, with a wave of the welfare wand, suddenly qualified for Medicare and Medicaid! Wow! Now WE get to pay for all her medical expenses and drug costs!
Mr. X is a Conservative and sensibly finds B.O. an inept, totalitarian lout. He is, however, quite pleased to benefit from the unwilling largesse of U.S. taxpayers.
I’ll bet, luckily for us, this is a unique case, don’t you? J
Y.C.
Mr. X, a naturalized citizen from country A, is a successful small businessman with a few enterprises. Mrs. X is a naturalized citizen of country B, where Communism happily collapsed, whereas the corrupt system continues to creak along in country A.
For a number of years, Mrs. X’s elderly mother traveled annually from B to spend several months with the X’s, and during that time Mr. X paid all her medical expenses and drug costs here. One year the U.S. said her visits were too prolonged to be classed as tourism and denied her a visa.
The X’s hired an attorney to investigate and learned that if the mother obtained a green card, she could live here permanently. She did just that, and, with a wave of the welfare wand, suddenly qualified for Medicare and Medicaid! Wow! Now WE get to pay for all her medical expenses and drug costs!
Mr. X is a Conservative and sensibly finds B.O. an inept, totalitarian lout. He is, however, quite pleased to benefit from the unwilling largesse of U.S. taxpayers.
I’ll bet, luckily for us, this is a unique case, don’t you? J
Y.C.
THE DEMOCRATS' FAVORITE ADVERB
It's "quickly," haven't you noticed? They plan to underhaul most aspects of our lives, it seems, but in every case question, debate, and reason must be sacrificed for celerity; everything has to be done quickly.
The reason for this, naturally, is so that no one has an opportunity to object to the runaway locomotive our left-wing government has become.
Does this subversion of government please you? If not, and if we still have a country in 2010, remember that when you vote.
The reason for this, naturally, is so that no one has an opportunity to object to the runaway locomotive our left-wing government has become.
Does this subversion of government please you? If not, and if we still have a country in 2010, remember that when you vote.
S. 909
You must be aware of this homage the Senate loony majority are set to pay organized queerdom. If you haven't calculated how harmful this unnecessary kow-towing is, take my word for it and tell your senator to vote "NO!"
Tuesday, June 9, 2009
HAVE YOU LOOKED FOR WINDOWS?
Lacking access to his writings, I am quoting a person that claims John Calvin wrote, “The Lord often permits Christians to be despised or rejected by the world, that being liberated and cleansed from its pollution, we may cultivate holiness. We must love those that do not love God, but [caps mine] CONFORMING OURSELVES TO THEIR STANDARDS FOR THEIR APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE IS DISASTROUS.”
In your daily lives don’t forget that “there is always a window, even when there are trivial earthly consequences.”
Further, how about this? “Why do you need a campaign [to restore prayer in schools]? Just have your children bow their heads and pray.” Now, revisit the capitalized phrase above.
In your daily lives don’t forget that “there is always a window, even when there are trivial earthly consequences.”
Further, how about this? “Why do you need a campaign [to restore prayer in schools]? Just have your children bow their heads and pray.” Now, revisit the capitalized phrase above.
Saturday, June 6, 2009
NEGATIVE ENDORSEMENT OF SOTOMAYOR
As much as I have always enjoyed being in Nevada, I’ve come to question the mentality of its residents, and the sole reason for this is Harry Reid. Any recorded comments of the man that I’ve heard are perforated with nonsensical 2-digit IQ inanities and contradictions. (Why do people re-elect patent losers? One hypothesis is the “he’s-got-seniority-and-power-think-what-he’ll-do-for-our-state” delusion. Look around; has Nevada taken any great leaps forward? Seniority and power mean bribes, and those benefit the graspers of same, not the peons that foolishly return them to office. A second explanation is simply that Nevada is polluted by Californians who tend to vote, almost by reflex, for the craziest of destructive lunatics like Boxer, Feinstein, and Pelosi.)
However, I digress - somewhat. The point is that if Reid made the statement “Dropped objects fall,” I would immediately conclude that Isaac Newton was an equal moron and buffoon. Thus, when he ballyhooed the perfection of Sotomayor, which exhalations of hot air were gazetted by the bigoted press that elected B.O., it cemented my earlier deduction about her incompetence to serve on the Supreme Court.
First of all, if you are not a member of some vocal minority or other, imagine yourself endowed with ability equal to that which she displays. Do you suppose you’d have “won” scholarships to Ivy League schools and walked away from Yale with a law degree? J (To her credit, though, unlike phony Populist, Ted Kennedy, she didn’t get the boot for cheating. This is more Michelle Obama-type affirmative action, though there’s no evidence that Sonia flunked an entrance exam and was nevertheless admitted.) Do you believe, then, that you’d have been appointed to high-level courts if politicians were NOT recruiting the votes of people of your minority?
At the same time, for decades this country has seen to it that incapable people were promoted into positions they could not possible discharge with expertise, so this is incidental compared to Sotomayor’s glaring deficiencies in principle and philosophy. Notice all her smug little jokes about and admissions to legislation by courts; her fatuous claims to appreciate laws better than a white, non-Spanish male; and B.O.’s use of the word “empathy” where he should have been discussing knowledge of law and the dedication to interpret it fairly. Clearly the letter of the Constitution takes a back seat to this woman’s intention to use her appointment to thrust a liberal dagger down our throats, and the devil take what the Constitution SAYS.
Over recent years the Supreme Court has generally rendered sane verdicts consistent with the Law of the Land, yet it has reversed 60% of Sotomayor’s Appeals Court decisions. Her current view that competence in jobs should take a lower priority than racial quotas is a clear signal of what to expect of her prejudicial rulings.
Suter, appointed by Bush senior, by the way, has been a sure-fire liberal vote every time the Supreme Court hears a case. Yet, according to the 8 May issue of the New York Times, the liberals’ bowsprit, he wasn’t acceptable. He, after all, only judged case-by-case and had the intolerable shortcoming of LACKING a wild-ass, liberal program of change to promote.
You can wager your last peso that B.O. didn’t make his selection in a way to confute the leading journal of his insane party.
If any of this fails to convince you, simply revert to the fact that intellectually-challenged Reid approves her. What better evidence is there than that?
Y.C.
However, I digress - somewhat. The point is that if Reid made the statement “Dropped objects fall,” I would immediately conclude that Isaac Newton was an equal moron and buffoon. Thus, when he ballyhooed the perfection of Sotomayor, which exhalations of hot air were gazetted by the bigoted press that elected B.O., it cemented my earlier deduction about her incompetence to serve on the Supreme Court.
First of all, if you are not a member of some vocal minority or other, imagine yourself endowed with ability equal to that which she displays. Do you suppose you’d have “won” scholarships to Ivy League schools and walked away from Yale with a law degree? J (To her credit, though, unlike phony Populist, Ted Kennedy, she didn’t get the boot for cheating. This is more Michelle Obama-type affirmative action, though there’s no evidence that Sonia flunked an entrance exam and was nevertheless admitted.) Do you believe, then, that you’d have been appointed to high-level courts if politicians were NOT recruiting the votes of people of your minority?
At the same time, for decades this country has seen to it that incapable people were promoted into positions they could not possible discharge with expertise, so this is incidental compared to Sotomayor’s glaring deficiencies in principle and philosophy. Notice all her smug little jokes about and admissions to legislation by courts; her fatuous claims to appreciate laws better than a white, non-Spanish male; and B.O.’s use of the word “empathy” where he should have been discussing knowledge of law and the dedication to interpret it fairly. Clearly the letter of the Constitution takes a back seat to this woman’s intention to use her appointment to thrust a liberal dagger down our throats, and the devil take what the Constitution SAYS.
Over recent years the Supreme Court has generally rendered sane verdicts consistent with the Law of the Land, yet it has reversed 60% of Sotomayor’s Appeals Court decisions. Her current view that competence in jobs should take a lower priority than racial quotas is a clear signal of what to expect of her prejudicial rulings.
Suter, appointed by Bush senior, by the way, has been a sure-fire liberal vote every time the Supreme Court hears a case. Yet, according to the 8 May issue of the New York Times, the liberals’ bowsprit, he wasn’t acceptable. He, after all, only judged case-by-case and had the intolerable shortcoming of LACKING a wild-ass, liberal program of change to promote.
You can wager your last peso that B.O. didn’t make his selection in a way to confute the leading journal of his insane party.
If any of this fails to convince you, simply revert to the fact that intellectually-challenged Reid approves her. What better evidence is there than that?
Y.C.
Friday, June 5, 2009
A PLUS FOR B.O.
Having excoriated the man - with ample justification - I must applaud his diplomatic efforts with the Muslim world. It seems to me that there must be sane, influential members of that group that can lead them away from maniacal acts of terrorism. We should continue searching for them, and B.O.'s overtures are a fine idea.
Y.C.
Y.C.
Thursday, June 4, 2009
VITIATING A MONTH
Nary a day passes without B.O.’s compounding some new affront to decency or heaping degradation on the country he purports to represent. The latest shame is his declaring June as a month for sexual deviates to flaunt their pride. Have you watched them exhibiting their pride on Folsom Street out in Queer City West? Do you know any emergency room nurses that have had to help extract hamsters and flashlight batteries from proud deviates’ anuses? Have you heard about God’s pride in the deviates at Sodom and Gomorrah?
The greatest pride of all, I imagine, must redound to the voting morons that brought this declension onto our country.
The greatest pride of all, I imagine, must redound to the voting morons that brought this declension onto our country.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)