1. The executive branch of government is required to enforce laws, and the President takes an oath of office to defend the Constitution. Thus, when our Putzident arrogantly refuses to enfore laws, why doesn't someone in the House introduce an impeachment motion? Is it because we have been conditioned not to criticize incompetent or lawless blacks, mulattoes, quadroons, octaroons, etc.?
2. If a zero-experience neighborhhod organizer can usurp the powers of Congress, which sits with its collective finger up its collective anus while he does, what difference is there who belongs to Congress? Shouldn't we simly contribute our funding and effort towards electing a president worthy of the title if our legislative representives are powerless to make the office behave as the Constitution stipulates?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment